The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there is an error of mistake of facts and misapprehension of legal principles as to this part of the facts charged, since the court below acquitted the defendant as to this part of the facts charged, since the defendant was found to have suffered an injury because the part on the left-hand hand of the victim driving on the right-hand side of the cargo vehicle was received and the part on the left-hand hand of the victim's driving.
B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (one million won of a fine) is too unhued and unreasonable.
2. Judgment on misconception of facts and misapprehension of legal principles
A. At around 10:00 on March 27, 2017, the primary and ancillary facts charged by the lower court found the Defendant not guilty. Around 10:00, the Defendant driven a wing-off freight vehicle owned by the Defendant and continued to drive the front road of the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do along one lane. In such a case, the person engaged in driving a motor vehicle had a duty of care to care to see the front line and to accurately operate the steering and steering gear. Nevertheless, without any negligence on duty, the Defendant was negligent in driving the motor vehicle at the right side of the said cargo vehicle in excess of 80 years old, and was driving the motor vehicle in excess of 1:0 on the left side of the said cargo vehicle in excess of 1:0 on the same direction, and thereby driving the motor vehicle in front of the 20-day driver’s license without any further injury to the victim of the motor vehicle in front of the 20-day driver’s license.
In such cases, automobiles;