logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.05.11 2017나78188
구상금
Text

1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as follows, and it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as provided in paragraph (3). Thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The Defendants asserts to the effect that, in light of the degree of injury suffered by the instant accident, C’s hospitalization period should be excessively excessive, the period of hospitalization need to be limited.

However, comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to evidence evidence Nos. 3 through 7 and evidence Nos. 11-1 and 2 of the same year, C, despite of the instant accident, was unable to return to the hospital’s hospital’s hospital’s present condition of treatment and return to the hospital’s original condition of treatment, in light of the following facts: “In addition to the patient’s flasium flasium, the fladium flasium flasium flasium fladsium fladsium fladsium fladsium flasium fladsium flasium fladsium fladsium fladsium fladsium fladsium, fladsium fladsium fladsium fladsium flaf, fladsium fladsium flaf, and C’s desire 3.

Therefore, the above assertion by the defendants is without merit.

3. Parts to be dried;

A. 3rd of the judgment of the court of first instance

(2) The judgment of paragraph (2) shall be made as follows:

“(2C.)”.

arrow