(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.12.23 2016고정640

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2016.12.23 2016고정640

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in the duty of driving a D taxi.

On January 9, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on January 9, 2016, and driven the two-lane road in front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, in the direction of the scarc-distance from the scarc-type intersection.

In this case, there was a duty of care to reduce speed and prevent accidents by properly examining the right and the right and the right of the driver of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, in order to drive a motor vehicle parked in the two-lane by negligence while neglecting this, the Defendant was driving by the victim F (F) who was standing in the future of the motor vehicle in order to drive the motor vehicle on the two-lanes.

The Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, suffered from an excellent malle and a part of the case in need of treatment for about three weeks, but immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as aiding the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the witness F in the court;

1. Partial statement of the police interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The defendant himself stated in this court and the police that he was aware of what he was parked on the front side of the vehicle parked in the front while driving in this case as stated in the judgment of the court and the police at the time of this case, and that he was aware of the fact that he was faced with the cab. There was a very high possibility that there was a possibility that he was a road going into the road and a cab, and there was a situation that there was a difference between the driver and the cab, and that there was a difference between what was not a person. ② At the time of this case, the defendant's driver's cab's right side was shocked by the victim's hand, and the defendant was also a cab immediately after the shock.

유사 판례

-서울서부지방법원 2016.01.29 2015노1674

-광주지방법원 2019.03.26 2018고단5018

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2014.02.19 2014고정9

-서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.17 2013고단5251