logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 부산고등법원 2016.03.23 2015나52015
기타(금전)
Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The grounds for admitting the judgment of the court of first instance are the same as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(B) The court below dismissed all of the plaintiffs' claims on the ground that "as alleged by the plaintiffs, there is no evidence that the agreement or consignment contract was concluded as part of the non-paid freezing sales revenue amount US$ 1,298,94.35, the court below rejected the plaintiffs' claims on the ground that the plaintiff sought payment of the amount stated in the above agreement as part of the non-paid freezing sales revenue amount US$ 1,298,94.35, under the premise that the agreement or consignment contract was concluded between February 2, 2009 and March 2009, as argued by the plaintiffs, with respect to freezing 1,872 tons of freezing 1,872 tons in this case, which is at issue in China, which was exported to G, which is a fishery product export-import business entity in China operated by F, which is a fishery product export-import business entity in China." The plaintiffs' claims were repeatedly asserted in the first instance court, and even if the plaintiffs' arguments as to some supplement and the plaintiff's representative director M&, the plaintiff's representative defendant's claims were dismissed.

arrow