The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) that the court below rendered on the defendant is too unreasonable.
2. The judgment seems to have given favorable consideration to the Defendant, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime, and that it appears that he/she had committed serious death and reflect on the victimized police officers several times, and that he/she appears to have committed any contingent crime under the influence of alcohol.
However, the crime of this case is a case where the defendant "it produces a trial fee to the persons under the influence of alcohol.
“The crime of this case was committed on February 13, 2018 after receiving a report from 112 and being sentenced to three years of imprisonment for the crime of rape on February 13, 2015, and on February 12, 2018, the Defendant committed the crime of this case only for three months after the execution of the sentence was completed, and other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, circumstances and result of the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, cannot be deemed unfair since the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable.
Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.