1. The Defendant: KRW 56,136,630; KRW 1,500,00 for each of the Plaintiff B and C; and KRW 375,00 for each of the said money.

1. Basic facts

A. As of October 4, 2013, Plaintiff A was in attendance at the third grade of E Middle School; Plaintiff B and C were the parents of Plaintiff A; Plaintiff D were the students of Plaintiff A; and the Defendant is a corporation established to carry out a mutual aid project for school safety accidents, which carries out the projects, such as mutual aid benefits, for the beneficiaries.

B. After the completion of classes on October 4, 2013, Plaintiff A, at a sports hall of the E Middle School before the end of classes, engaged in the injury of Plaintiff A, i.e., e., e., the e., the e., the e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e.

(hereinafter “instant school safety accident”). C.

On August 11, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a claim for reimbursement under the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents with the Defendant.

The Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for School Safety Accidents related to the School Safety Accidents in this case (hereinafter referred to as the "School Safety Accident Compensation Act") and the Enforcement Decree of the School Safety Accident Compensation Act shall be as specified in the attached Form.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Scope of occurrence of liability to pay mutual aid benefits and liability for payment;

A. The fact that the instant school safety accident falls under the school safety accident under Article 2 subparag. 6 of the School Safety Accident Compensation Act, and the fact that Plaintiff A suffered physical damage due to the instant school safety accident, but remains a disability (15% of the labor force loss rate) even after the medical treatment was completed, is no dispute between the parties.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay mutual aid benefits to the plaintiffs in accordance with the School Safety Accident Compensation Act.

B. (1) The fact that Plaintiff A’s lost income due to the instant school safety accident is 62,513,683 does not conflict between the parties.

(2) The evidence adopted prior to the limitation of liability and the evidence set forth in No. 1 are admitted as follows.