logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.06.29 2015구합12854
손실보상금
Text

1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. From June 20, 2006, the Plaintiff had operated the Dayang Fishing Grounds in Gwangju Mine-gu B and C (hereinafter “instant fish farm”).

(A) On March 31, 2007, the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor and the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor announced the Fro Development Project (hereinafter referred to as the “instant project”) in the E-ro announced by Gwangju Metropolitan City (No. 16), and the instant fish farm was included in the instant project area.

The operator of the instant project appears to have been the Gwangju Metropolitan City Mayor and later changed to the defendant.

(A) Evidence No. 16, No. 16, and No. 4). The plaintiff and the defendant do not dispute the fact that they are the operators of the instant project.

C. On April 4, 2013, the Defendant applied to the Plaintiff for expropriation of 80,000,0000,0000,0000,0000,00000,0000,0000,0000,0000,0000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,00,00,00.

(A) No. 7 3 pages)

On December 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) sought to gather ornamental fish and public water stuffed fish from the instant fish farm on December 10, 2014 for the purpose of evaluating ornamental fish and public water stuffed fish in the instant fish farm; (b) however, the Defendant captured only 25mari 16.4g, dongg, 112mari 6.7km; (c) 219mari 36.1kg, 19mari 36.4g; (d) natural snive fish and public water stuffed fish within the instant fish farm; and (e) failed to gather ornamental fish and public water stuffed.

(A) No. 15-1), on the other hand, the defendant.

arrow