logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.07.12 2018고정455
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a Bchip car.

On November 21, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 18:50 on November 21, 2017, and led to the coming of 34, the two-way intersection from the west-ro to the west-ro.

Since the place is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the vehicle in accordance with the signals by making the front and rear left and right well.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to enter the above intersection and directly go through the yellow signal signal, and received the front portion of the DNA boarding car driven by the victim C (I am, 41 years old) who was driving from the scam scam to the scam scam in accordance with the new code from the scam scam on the left front part of the motor vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as the closure of the five handwritten fingers in need of approximately four weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Reports on traffic accidents, and reports on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The signal cycle tag;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing black boxes and video CDs;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s negligence on duty that caused a traffic accident is serious in violation of the reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

The degree of injury suffered by the victim is not easy.

However, the defendant reflects his wrongness.

Defendant's vehicles are covered by comprehensive automobile insurance.

There are no criminal records of the same kind.

In addition, the background of the crime of this case, the age, sex, living environment, and crime of this case.

arrow