logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.28 2017누76632
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument at the court of first instance, and even if the evidence submitted at the court of first instance showed the statement of evidence No. 6 additionally submitted at the court of first instance, the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified.

Therefore, the reasoning of this court concerning this case is as follows: (a) the reasoning of the first instance judgment is the same as that of Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except where the court considers “D” as “E,” respectively, on the grounds of the judgment of the first instance.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow