1. The Seoul Central District Court 2010 tea31804 has executive force between the non-party D limited company and the defendant.

Facts of recognition

The facts alleged by the Plaintiff as the cause of the instant claim do not conflict between the parties, or are recognized by considering the whole purport of the pleadings as a whole in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3 (including the number of branch numbers).

Judgment

According to the above facts, it is reasonable for the Seoul Central District Court to grant the execution clause to the plaintiff who is the successor of the non-party D limited liability company for compulsory execution against the defendant.

Although the defendant asserts that the plaintiff's claim is accepted, but the defendant does not have sufficient means to repay, this does not constitute a justifiable ground to refuse the plaintiff's claim of this case.

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.