The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (one year and two months of imprisonment, and 40 hours of order to complete a sexual assault treatment program) is too unreasonable.

2. In full view of the facts that there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared with the original judgment, and that the Defendant committed each of the larceny and attempted larceny in this case during the period of repeated crime committed by the same kind of crime, and the various sentencing conditions specified in the records and pleadings, the lower court’s sentence cannot be deemed unfair. Therefore, the Defendant’s above assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.