logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.11.20 2014구합60597
감봉처분취소
Text

1. On September 30, 2013, the Defendant’s salary reduction for the Plaintiff among the request for measures as a result of sector inspection to the IBK Bank.

Reasons

The plaintiff entered the IBK Enterprise Bank (hereinafter referred to as the "Corporate Bank") on September 2, 1981 and was working as the head of the individual customer bank team at the Enterprise Bank B branch around December 26, 2012.

On September 30, 2013, the Defendant notified the Enterprise Bank of the results of sector inspection, and asked the Plaintiff to take measures for the reduction of salary for three months against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 4(1) of the Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Confidentiality (hereinafter “Act on Real Name Financial Transactions and Guarantee of Secrecy”) on December 26, 2012, upon receiving a telephone as to whether the bank account under the name of C Hospital (the instant hospital is an individual hospital and the hospital account is a bank account under the name of D) was in the name of C Hospital (the instant hospital is a bank account under the name of D).

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). Meanwhile, the Defendant notified of the result of sector inspection as above, and informed that “In the event of an objection to the request for disposition, an objection may be filed within one month from the date of receipt of the notification of the request for disposition, and an administrative appeal and administrative litigation may be filed within 90 days.”

On October 2, 2013, when an enterprise bank receives a notice of the result of the sector inspection, and when it considers that it is illegal or unjust when it notifies the Plaintiff of the requirements to take measures on October 8, 2013, it presented relevant regulations to the Financial Services Commission or the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service in accordance with the relevant laws and regulations while guiding the Financial Services Commission or the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service to file an objection, and specified the time limit for filing an objection as November 1, 2013.

On October 29, 2013, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Financial Supervisory Commission through the Financial Services Commission.

On November 6, 2013, the Governor of the Financial Supervisory Service shall receive the aforementioned objection, and on November 18, 2013.

arrow