(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.03 2014가단223398

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.06.03 2014가단223398

손해배상(자)

Text

1. The Plaintiff’s obligation to compensate for damages arising from an accident listed in the separate sheet against the Defendant is KRW 90,000 and this obligation.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 13:00 on June 30, 2014, the Plaintiff, as indicated in the attached list, opened the door of the vehicle in the column C operated by the Plaintiff at the Jung-gu Daejeon District Parking Lot, Daejeon, and damaged the front door of the BMW vehicle owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “Defendant vehicle”).

(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)

The defendant demanded that the plaintiff pay the repair cost of the defendant vehicle and the rental cost of the rental car.

C. The defendant vehicle is not accepted as of the closing date of pleadings.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 and 3 (including virtual number)

2. The parties' assertion

A. The Plaintiff’s cost of repairing the Defendant vehicle is KRW 510,000,000,000,000,000,000 for the repair of the plate in front of the steering chief and for the reconstruction of the string for vehicles, and the subsequent transportation cost.

Therefore, the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay damages to the Defendant does not exceed KRW 990,000.

B. The defendant's assertion that the defendant is liable to pay from the plaintiff 789,580 won for the cost of repairing the plate, 3.5 million won for the whole vehicle, 3.5 million won for the loan due to the dispute with the plaintiff, and 30 days for the loan period, and 1.2 million won for the rent of the vehicle for 30 days, and damages for delay.

3. Determination

A. According to the fact that the damage claim occurred, the plaintiff is liable to compensate the defendant for the damage incurred by the accident of this case as a tortfeasor.

B. (1) In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in the images of evidence Nos. 1 and 3 (including paper numbers) of the repair cost, it can be acknowledged that the accident in this case occurred with a force to impergize the damage to the Defendant vehicle, and in light of the location, degree of damage, the smoke of the Defendant vehicle, etc., if the damaged part is sold, and it is impossible to restore the damaged part to its original state only with skins or some skins.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2017.04.27 2015가단110042

-서울중앙지방법원 2020.09.22 2019나80871

-서울중앙지방법원 2019.09.27 2019나16320

-의정부지방법원 2019.05.02 2017가단28269

-서울남부지방법원 2019.10.16 2019가단9518