본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2013.08.08 2013고단441

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and two months.


Punishment of the crime

On October 18, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to 10 months of imprisonment for embezzlement at the Seoul Eastern District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 8, 2013.

around 2009, the Defendant went to a F casino located in the E hotel located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and came to know of the victim G (the age of 37) working in the E hotel. From October 201, the Defendant came to know of the victim G (the age of 37).

1. On November 201, 201, the Defendant, at a coffee shop, where it is impossible to know the trade name located in the E hotel located in the E hotel located in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) on the first day of November, 201, concluded that “the Defendant shall not extract the vehicle under the name of a foreigner’s permanent resident who is going to board the vehicle at home. The Defendant shall not collect the vehicle in the name of the victim. The Defendant shall receive the loan from the Hyundai Capital Capital, and shall transfer the vehicle in his name after paying the interest, or complete payment of the balance.”

However, the defendant did not have a fixed occupation, and there was no intention or ability to transfer the vehicle in the name of the defendant or to pay the vehicle to the victim because the defendant could not obtain a loan from a financial institution without any property because he did not have any property.

Around November 14, 201, the Defendant had the victim purchase Ienz SP car in the name of the victim before the victim's house in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City around November 14, 201, and around that time, borrowed KRW 40,000,000 from the Hyundai Capital Capital Capital, and received this car from the victim, but delivered only a part of the installments to the victim, and did not pay the remainder of the loan 36,102,219 won and did not pay it to the victim, thereby obtaining economic benefits equivalent to the same amount.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired financial benefits by deceiving the victim.

2. On December 8, 2011, the Defendant calls to the victim at a place where the Seoul Gangnam-gu Seoul does not know any place below Gangnam-gu Seoul, and want to return to the victim on the premise of marriage.

at the JJ of the Company under its jurisdiction.