1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

(a) calculated, the person’s assessment point was calculated as 92.20 points;

On the contrary, the Defendant assessed the Plaintiffs as 91.11 points, which is based on the E-grade 7.8% (=540 x84.82% x51% / 300 / 300 / 200 / 300 / 7.8) calculated on the basis of the evaluation criteria scale, excluding 90 / 18 flight teams construction experience from the Defendant’s construction experience.

However, the plaintiffs could not be determined as the successful bidder of the bid in this case because it does not exceed 92 points from the comprehensive average point as follows, if any one of 34 lights such as the guiding road or 56 lights such as guiding road, etc. among the 18 flight team works of the plaintiff water supply system.

The plaintiffs, 273 points (630x *43.26%) recognized 90.8% D (8.9 points) 92.20 points, 34 points, o-ro, etc., 92.9% E (7.8 points) 91.11 points x 56 points, 248 non-recognized 248 points (574x 43.26%), 56 points, etc., 82.8% E (574 points) since 91.11 points x 56 points, 90 points, etc. were all 90 points and 90 points, etc. were all 274 points (7.8 points), but the plaintiffs, 54% of the total number of 194 points and 27.28% of the tender notice notice of this case were 5% of the tender notice of the plaintiffs 28% of the tender notice of this case (540x 26% of the tender notice of this case).7148% of the tender notice of 27.7.8% of the plaintiffs