logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2017.11.02 2017고단1015
도로교통법위반(음주운전)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 5, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 1.5 million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws in the Gangnam Branch of the Chuncheon District Court on August 5, 2013. On October 1, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of 8 million won for a crime of violating road traffic laws at the Seoul Southern District Court on Seoul Southern District Court on December 17, 2015. On December 17, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for imprisonment with prison labor for a crime of obstructing the performance of official duties at the Seoul Southern District Court on December 25, 2015 and the said judgment became final and conclusive as of December

Although the Defendant was punished for driving alcohol twice as above, on August 9, 2017, the Defendant driven CNAS car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.252% alcohol concentration from the 1.5m section of approximately 1.5m alcohol level from the 119 Safety Center in front of the Don-Do 16, which was located in the 3rd side of the Don-gu Don-dong 16th of the Don-Don-dong Don-dong, to the Paris Don-dong 429m of the same Eup.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking alcohol and a statement in the circumstances of the driver of drinking alcohol;

1. A report on investigation (a statement by a reporter);

1. A report on investigation (booms), a suspect vehicle boom image, a suspect vehicle boom, a suspect vehicle boom CD;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (referring to such previous convictions and report);

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing a sentence of imprisonment for a specific crime, Article 148-2(1)1, and Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 148-2(1) of the Act on the Selection of Punishment for a Specific Crime: The crime of this case was committed again even though the person was punished as a fine for committing an injury in 2016 without being familiar with the person during the period of probation, and the degree of drinking is considerably favorable: The circumstances in which the person committed the crime of this case, and the degree of drinking is recognized as being favorable: The defendant's mistake is recognized and against the person's age, sexual behavior, and the circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined as the same as the order, taking

arrow