A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 27, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months of imprisonment for fraud in the Sungnam branch of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of 2016, and the above judgment was finalized on November 25, 2016. On July 14, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for one year of imprisonment for fraud in the support of Suwon branch of Suwon branch of Dogwon, and the above judgment became final and conclusive on July 22, 2016.

Criminal facts

1. On October 20, 2015, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim C: (a) on the street in front of the Seocho-gu Eup/Myeon Office in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si; (b) on the street, the Victim C has a duty to transport the vehicle from the Trith day to the Frith day; (c) the prime week to the Frith day to the Frith day; (d) the prime week to the Frith day to the Frith day to the Frith day; (c) the Defendant

In other words, the phrase “assumed” was false.

However, even if the defendant receives the purchase price of the vehicle, he did not have the intent and ability to secure the transportation route promised to the victim, employ it as an open article, or arrange the purchase of the cargo.

Defendant deceptioned the victim as above, and acquired KRW 3,00,000 from the victim on October 21, 2015, KRW 300,000,000,000 from the intermediate payment around November 2, 2015, and KRW 10,000,000 from December 1, 2015 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account (E) in the name of D and acquired the sum of KRW 43,00,00 from the victim.

2. On March 2016, the Defendant committed a crime against Victim F with the victim F by entering into an implied delivery contract with the victim F at the (ju) D office located in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si, and the victim F by entering into an agreement with the victim F.

In order to carry out carriage, H MT must purchase and enter the freight vehicle. It was false that H MT must purchase and enter the vehicle.

However, even if the defendant receives the purchase price of the vehicle, he did not have the intent and ability to secure the delivery route to the victim by purchasing the vehicle and registering it in the name of D (State).

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and thereby deceivings the victim on March 28, 2016, KRW 3 million for the down payment on March 28, 2016, and KRW 10 million for the intermediate payment on March 31, 2016.