logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2018.01.19 2017고정1547
상해
Text

1. Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2,000,000 won;

2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

From November 2015, the Defendant, who is in a de facto marital relationship with C, resided in the restaurant operated by the Defendant from around November 2015, along with E (10 years of age) who is his/her father and woman, in the above restaurant operated by the Defendant.

On March 17, 2017, the Defendant suffered injury, such as making the victim E (n, 10 years of age) lost this book at the above restaurant around 17:00, on the ground that he lost the face of the victim five times in the city, and making the victim escape from the face of the victim more than five times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. Statement made by the police with F, and statement made by the police with respect to E (secondly);

1. Stenographic records of the Gwangju Sea Center;

1. Copy of the victim E-mail and the decision of the family court at the time of investigation;

1. 피해자 사진 4매, E를 인도 받은 이후 사진 8매 [ 피고인 및 변호인은, 1) 피고인이 피해자에게 출혈이 발생할 정도의 상해를 가한 사실이 없을 뿐만 아니라, 2) 피고인이 훈계차원에서 피해자에게 1 차례 꿀밤을 때린 적은 있으나, 이는 사회 상규를 위반하지 않은 정당행위로서 위법성이 없다고 주장한다.

However, the victim has consistently made a specific and consistent statement from the investigative agency to the time before and after the act of injury of the defendant and the circumstances. In particular, the victim has made a livingly statement from the defendant that he/she suffered from blood transfusions and directly experienced about the situation where he/she left a chest, and the image of the victim's chest is consistent with the above statement of the victim. Thus, each of the victim's investigative agency and this court statements is credibility.

I would like to say.

According to each of the above evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the statement of the victim with credibility, the defendant was found to have made a false statement as to the loss of a bank by a police officer on March 2017.

arrow