beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. On August 14, 2016, around 23:55, the Defendant and C of the facts charged are facing the victim F in front of E on the street in Bupyeong-si D, Seocheon-si, the Defendant and C of the facts charged: (a) talked with the victim F and the drinking-si toilet after a compromise between the victim F and the drinking-house with a shoulder, and then, (b) the victim F in front of E, while they faceed with the shoulder again, I would like to take the victim F face at a drinking time; and (c) the Defendant was faced with the victim F face going beyond the victim F's body when she takes the victim's face at a drinking time; and (d) the Defendant was faced with the victim's G her face by walking the victim's G.
As such, the Defendant, together with C, inflicted bodily injury on the victim F of the face lorry, etc. in which the number of days cannot be known to the victim F, and inflicted injury on the victim G, such as the right side lorry in need of treatment for about 21 days.
2. The Determination F stated in this Court that it cannot be known whether a person who assaults himself is C or not, and that at the time, the color color of the world on which C and the Defendant entered is not memoryd.
G In this Court, the person who assaults himself is not the defendant but the defendant, and is a C with a photograph on the 20th page of the investigation record.
A person who assaults F with F by going on the body of F is not the defendant but C, and immediately after the case, the defendant assaulted F with him when he is investigated in the earth.
The statement was stated to be by mistake.
Meanwhile, according to the evidence submitted on the other hand, F, G and the Defendant are not aware of the fact that the Defendant did not pay damages to F and G, or did not reach an agreement after the occurrence of the assault case. Considering such fact, the credibility of F and G’s legal statement can be acknowledged.
In light of the above G’s legal statement, it is insufficient to find the Defendant guilty of committing an injury by assaulting F and G only with the evidence submitted by the prosecution, and it is different from that.