logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.02.10 2014가단794
대여금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was the Chairperson of the C Committee (hereinafter “instant Committee”) around 2007, and the Defendant was the general supervisor of the instant Committee around the same time.

B. At the office of the instant commission, the Plaintiff: (a) on June 1, 2007, KRW 23 million to the Defendant; and (b) the same month.

5. Each payment of KRW 7 million was made.

(2) The sum of the above 30 million won (hereinafter referred to as “the instant money”). / [Ground of recognition] There is no dispute, and entry of Gap evidence No. 1

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that the funds in this case are loans to the defendant, and the defendant asserts that the funds in this case are money used as activity expenses of the committee in this case.

B. In light of the relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, the Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, since it is difficult to recognize the instant money as the Plaintiff’s loan to the Defendant by itself, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

3. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow