logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.05.14 2014고합942
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a registered interpreter of the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office, and a person who has been in charge of English interpretation in the Incheon District Prosecutors' Office.

1. Fraud;

A. On August 28, 2014, the Defendant stated that “A U.S. victim C, who was investigated as a suspect in a waiting room for a civil petitioner in the Suwon-si World Cup 120 U.S. District Prosecutors’ Office located in Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 2014, had paid time to interpret the person as a volunteer without compensation. The Defendant personally borne the value of oil and road expenses, etc. on the basis of interpretation.”

However, the defendant received the fixed daily allowance, the interpretation cost per hour, the travel expenses, the accommodation expenses, and the food expenses according to the public official travel expenses regulations in accordance with the public official travel expenses regulations.

Therefore, it was obtained 30,00 won from the victim, namely, in the seat, as a guard, and acquired it.

B. On August 29, 2014, the Defendant, at the place indicated in the foregoing paragraph (a) around o.m. on August 29, 2014, deceptioned the victim D who was investigated as a suspect of a drug case by the aforementioned method, and acquired 40,000 won from the victim to the Defendant’s agricultural bank account for expenses, on September 2, 2014.

2. Violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and the fraud accused came to know on August 28, 2014 that while carrying out an interpretation work with respect to F, the victim, who was investigated as a suspect in the Epublic prosecutor's office in the above public prosecutor's office, around P.M., the victim was married to the United States and tried to acquire U.S. nationality. After the victim returned to the Republic of Korea upon completion of the investigation with respect to the victim, the victim, who was an investigator in charge, after returning home, he would not have any problem with the acquisition of U.S. nationality because the record of the case against F was not notified to the United States.

arrow