logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 영덕지원 2015.05.27 2015고단91
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 20, 2008, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 2.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act from the Port Branch of Daegu District Court on June 20, 2008, and on May 15, 2009, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 3 million as the same crime in the same court.

Although the Defendant had been punished twice due to drunk driving, on February 22, 2015, at around 16:45, the Defendant again driven Csch Rexton car under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.154% without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of approximately 2.4m from the front of the port of correction in the Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, North Korean Livestock at the same time to the front of the East Sea Council in the same Myeon Livestock Council.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written statement of D (in the event of traffic accidents);

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, report on the results of the control of driving under influence, report on the circumstances of a driving under influence, report on a traffic accident (1) (2) (2) (2) (2)) and report on a traffic accident, checking of each vehicle, register of driver's licenses (A), and report on an investigation;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Criminal history records, etc., inquiry report (A), investigation report (related to inquiry about the results of crackdown on driving, and investigation report), investigation report, and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (1) 1, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of repeated driving at least three times), subparagraph 1 of Article 152 of the Road Traffic Act, and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Formal concurrence and the choice of a punishment (the punishment that is heavier than that prescribed by the Road Traffic Act shall be punished, but the punishment shall be imposed, and the choice of a fine shall be imposed);

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow