logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.13 2015나74441
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the defendant Handu Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. ordering payment exceeding the following amounts:

Reasons

1. The reasons for the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance are as stated in the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written by the court: therefore, it shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The part to be mard;

A. First Instance 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance: “The number of materials equivalent to KRW 5,143,500, and the number of materials and materials equivalent to KRW 11,942,600, which have been kept in the Lestop of this case” shall be read as “the number of materials and materials equivalent to KRW 11,942,60, which have been kept in the Lesp of this case” (i.e., food materials of KRW 5,143,500, KRW 6,799,100, KRW 14, and evidence 614).

B. Class 15 of the 10th page: “The total amount of damages (17,086,100 Won 5,143,500 Won 11,942,600)” shall be read as “amount of damages 11,942,600 won”;

(c) 11: 20,98,445 won [17,98,445 won [17,08,00 won [17,086,10 won [22,485,557 won] x 80%) 16,873,645 won [13,645 won [13,873,645 won [3,000 won for property damage [5,39,457 won for freezing and repair, 11,942,60 won = 17,342,00 won] x 3,000 won]; 16,873,645 won [3,645 won for property damage]

3. According to the conclusion, Defendant Handu Construction is liable to pay to the Plaintiff 16,873,645 won and damages for delay calculated by the rate of 5% per annum under the Civil Act from September 3, 2014 to October 13, 2016, which is the date following the delivery date of a copy of the claim of this case and the application for modification of cause, sought by the Plaintiff, for which the said Defendant, from September 3, 2014 to September 13, 2016, and from the following day to the date of full payment.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendant Han-gu Construction shall be partially accepted within the scope of the above recognition, and the claim against the defendant Eul shall be dismissed as there is no ground, and the part against the defendant Han-gu Construction among the judgment of the court of first instance which exceeds the above recognition amount shall be lost.

arrow