logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2014.05.26 2014고단580
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On August 2011, the Defendant committed fraud in 2011, at the first floor office underground of D University Law Center in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the victim B, “Abdo not have any money suffering from her death in prison, which he/she had left in prison.” The father borrowed money to allow his/her husband to undergo an operation. If the lending company borrowed money from the lending company, 100 million won was at the time of the apartment deposit at the end of 3-4 months, and thus, he/she could have repaid the money with the money.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a father's face value, and at the time there was a personal debt of KRW 75 million, and the apartment bond is expected to receive KRW 50 million or used for the repayment of his/her loan, and he/she did not have any intent or ability to repay the loan borrowed from the lending company in the name of the victim after 3-4 months as the promise was made in the condition that he/she repaid his/her debt by means of return because he/she is unable to receive monthly payment and it is impossible to recover the debt.

On September 21, 201, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim and deceiving the victim, obtained 6.5 million won from the victim’s account under the name of the Defendant on September 21, 201, 3 million won from the same account on the 22th of the same month, and acquired 12.5 million won in total from the same account on the 29th of the same month.

2. The Defendant committing the crime of fraud in 2013 shall pay one million won as a fine to the victim B from May 13, 2013 to the victim B by the end of the 2013th century.

In the absence of such money, seizure has been entered in the house.

The loan of 1 million won per unit;

5.23.Dominate Doz.

5. shall be repaid up to 23.

“The phrase was false.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the borrowed money to the victim even if the personal debt is paid monthly due to the fact that it reaches KRW 100 million.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, received 467,00,000 won from the victim, namely, i.e., 467,000 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Prosecutions against the Defendant.

arrow