Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

However, as to the Defendants for three years from the date of the final judgment of this case, the Defendants are above.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a person who operates a danran with the trade name of "F" in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Defendant B was the head of the public relations committee of the Busan City City Party before the G Party, and on June 5, 2013, the Busan High Court was sentenced to imprisonment with labor for a violation of the Public Official Election Act, etc., and the judgment was finalized on January 16, 2014.

Defendant

B at the I Jpenta VIP room in the area of the Ha of the former North Korea, around December 2010, to the effect that “A upon request of a public official in charge, so that a person in charge may carry out a water skiing project in the L Area,” and Defendant A shall hear the horses from that side, and “B punishment shall be sufficiently possible,” and the belief that the person in charge is believed to be the national bank account in the name of Defendant A, around May 18, 201,” and that “A shall be able to report and believe that a person in charge is 10 million won.”

5. Around October 19th of the same year received KRW 10 million in total from the same account and received KRW 120 million in total from the same account around 19th of the same year.

As a result, the Defendants received money and valuables in collusion for soliciting the cases or affairs handled by public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant A's partial statement

1. Legal statement of K witness K;

1. Written statement by prosecution;

1. Each investigation report (No. 17,35, 41 No. 17, 31);

1. Recording notes;

1. Details of deposit transactions (No. 4), A financial transaction statement (Evidence No. 18), A financial transaction statement (Evidence No. 43), and A’s account transaction statement (Evidence No. 43);

1. Previous convictions (Defendant B): Criminal records (Evidence No. 1), investigation reports (Evidence List No. 49), and each written judgment (Evidence List No. 13,50), Defendant B and their defense counsel have been divided into stories related to the water skiing ground of this case with Defendant B and K, but there is no fact that Defendant B received KRW 120,000 from K in collusion with A in relation to the permission of the above water skiing ground of this case.