1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance, since Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act are the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the submission or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows.

(hereinafter the meaning of the terms used in this context is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance). 2. In addition, the second part of the terms dried or added is to add the term “scambling” after “scambling 4-5 level below the second part.”

Part 4 "Article 24" in Part 11 shall be changed to "Article 24."

The evidence and evidence in Part 17 of the 5th page shall be added to the following "Evidences 13, 14, 16 of the A":

After the last 12th day of the 6th page, the following shall be added:

It is difficult to view that the act of Plaintiff A, as alleged by the Plaintiff, was separated from the act of Plaintiff A’s occurrence and the act of her husband, and the latter constitutes “school safety accident” under the Act on the Prevention of and Compensation for Accidents at School, and it does not constitute “school violence” under the School Violence Prevention Act.

) The part of the 6th page 15 to 16 of the “instant case” is deleted, and the following is added between the 18th page and the 19th page.

No. 554, May 1, 2012, 201; hereinafter “No. 5554, May 1, 2011; hereinafter “No. 5555, May 1, 201; hereinafter “No. 555, May 1, 201; hereinafter “No. 15, etc.”), which was held on November 2, 2016 by the parents of the two parents, had to take due care of each other and make efforts to resolve the situation of school violence from the date of the occurrence of the instant case.