1. Defendant B’s KRW 5,022,210 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from January 18, 2014 to April 6, 2016, and on April 7, 2016.

1. The Defendants, around January 18, 2014, set up a motor vehicle in front of the entrance passage of the D apartment parking lot in Gwanak-gu, Seoul and divided conversations within the scope of the motor vehicle.

When the plaintiff was aware that he had returned home while under the influence of alcohol and lost his mobile phone, he met the surrounding area of the defendants in order to find it, and he faced with his body in the process.

Defendant C, upon approaching the driver’s seat, opened a door to the driver’s seat, and told the Plaintiff to the effect that “I have come to the driver’s seat as soon as possible,” and again closed the door into the vehicle.

The plaintiff forcedly opened a driver's seat and expressed the defendants' desire.

Accordingly, Defendant B had his body out of the train and had his body fighted with the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff met with the face in the process of using it on the land.

Defendant B: (a) committed assault, such as the Plaintiff’s hicker’s hicker’s hicker, the Plaintiff’s hicker, and the Defendant C’s hicker.

As a result, the plaintiff suffered from the injury of the sacrife of the sacrife between the upper right and the upper right and the sacrife of the sacrife between the upper right and the upper right and the upper right.

The Plaintiff spent KRW 1,460,300 as medical expenses when receiving dental treatment in E.

As a result of the instant case, the Plaintiff received a summary order of KRW 700,000 and KRW 4 million from Defendant B received a summary order, and Defendant C received a disposition to the effect that he was guilty.

The plaintiff filed a request for formal trial against the summary order, and the defendant B received a decision not to dismiss the public prosecution in accordance with the brightness of the intention not to punish the defendant B.

(Seoul Central District Court Order 2014MaMa3295 dated September 15, 2014). The plaintiff filed a subsequent complaint against the Defendants for murder and attempted murder, but was subject to a disposition to the effect that the Defendants were dismissed and prosecuted.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry or video set forth in Gap's 1, 6, 8 through 11, 13, Eul's 1 through 1 (including paper numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant B