logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.13 2016고정1835
자동차손해배상보장법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who holds Cone Star Co., Ltd.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle on a road, which has not been covered by mandatory insurance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant:

1. On May 18, 2016, at around 14:50, the passenger vehicles are operated without mandatory insurance at a section of about 8 km from the front of the Namyang-dong Office in Sungsung-si to the front of the said office to the roads located in the 1700 km-ro in the Yellow Sea in the same city;

2. On May 19, 2016, around 10:10, the 10:0 p.m. operation of the said m. vehicle, which was not covered by mandatory insurance at approximately 2 km section from the front of the office of Yangyang-si Office in Sungsung-si to the same city (hereinafter “Manyang-si”) to the intersection

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Reporting on detection (Violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act);

1. Report on the occurrence of the case;

1. Inquiry into the enemy;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing compulsory insurance;

1. Relevant Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act and the selection of fines, respectively, concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant operates a vehicle without being covered by mandatory insurance again on the following day after he was controlled by the operation of a vehicle without being covered by insurance; however, the defendant's recognition of the instant crime is against himself; the defendant appears to have been insured after the second control; and the defendant's age, health conditions, circumstances and results of the instant crime; and the circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as stated in the order.

arrow