The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentencing of the lower court (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. Although the Defendant made a confession of and reflects on the crime, in light of the fact that he/she committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime due to the same crime, he/she committed the crime of this case again during the period of repeated crime, and that he/she conducted a driving without obtaining a license again within six days from the date on which he/she was served a written indictment for the crime of violating the Road Traffic Act as of May 8, 2015, the sentence of imprisonment against the Defendant is inevitable.

In addition, considering the Defendant’s age, family relation, living environment, motive, details and result of the crime, and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the instant case, such as circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s punishment is adequate.

3. The appeal by the defendant is without merit and it is so decided as per Disposition in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.