Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 6,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in a SP area.

On June 4, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car without obtaining a driver's license at around 18:45 on June 4, 2018, while driving the said car and driving the road of five lanes adjacent to the E-lane D located in Yongsan-si Metropolitan Area into three lanes, and driving the vehicle into the area of wind sacheon Sacheon Sacheon-distance. The Defendant changed the four lanes.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to ascertain the safety of the course and to change the course by notifying the change of the vehicle line by direction, etc., and taking into account well the direction of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the two lanes from three lanes to four lanes, thereby resulting in the Defendant’s failure to drive the Victim B(24 years of age) driving the four lanes in four lanes, and received the front part of the Montreal Master’s Montreal 821, with the rear wheels of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the 15,591,00 won of the repair cost by occupational negligence, which requires approximately five weeks of treatment to the victim. At the same time, the Defendant damaged the 15,591,000 won of the repair cost.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness B;

1. A traffic accident report, on-site inspection report, and on-site photographs;

1. Bluebbbox CDs;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Medical certificate and written estimate [Judgment on the argument of the defendant and his/her defense counsel]

1. At the time of the instant accident, the Defendant: (a) known about five seconds of the direction at the time of the instant accident; (b) checked the change of course; (c) checked the safety of course; and (d) performed the duty of care by changing the lane; (b) however, the Defendant was not negligent in the occurrence of the instant accident on the wind that finds the Defendant’s vehicle, which was delayed due to the sudden change of the lane, of the bus stopped at the rear side of the four lanes; and (c) there was no fault on the occurrence of the instant accident.

2. The Board;