The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

On January 2, 2014, at around 06:05, the Defendant assaulted the victim, against the assaulting that the Defendant stopped immediately next to the Plaintiff, on the ground that the Defendant stopped without stopping on the back of the cab of the victim C, and that the Defendant was able to look at the Defendant’s breath, bat the bat, fat the Defendant’s bat, and fat the Defendant’s bat, and fat the Defendant’s bat, and fat the Defendant’s bat around the floor.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police interrogation protocol to C to each police interrogation protocol

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. A fine not exceeding 300,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,00 won per day) of the Criminal Act for the inducement of a workhouse;

1. The Defendant’s assertion regarding Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (such as the fact that the instant crime was committed in the course of setting up against the other party’s violence, and the fact that the damage was not significant) of the suspended sentence asserts that it is not unlawful since the instant crime was committed to defend the other party’s assault. However, according to the record, the illegality is recognized since the Defendant went beyond the extent of defense, and the Defendant’s active attack may