1. The Defendant’s reprimand disposition against the Plaintiff on May 16, 2016 shall be revoked.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On April 1, 1998, the Plaintiff was appointed as YY and transferred to C middle school teachers on March 1, 2014. From March 1, 2015 to February 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was temporarily retired from office under Article 71 subparagraph 6 of the State Public Officials Act (hereinafter referred to as “full-time school assistant”) and was in office as Cmiddle school teachers on March 1, 2016.

The Assembly and Demonstration Act was enacted on October 29, 2015, and was enacted on October 29, 2015, and on October 11, 2015, and was enacted on October 29, 2015, when the Assembly and Demonstration Act was enacted on October 29, 2015, and was enacted on October 29, 201, when the Assembly and Demonstration Act was enacted on October 22, 2015.

On May 16, 2016, the Defendant issued a reprimand pursuant to Article 78 (1) 1 of the State Public Officials Act on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Article 56 (Duty of Fidelity), Article 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity), and Article 66 (Prohibition of Collective Action) (1) of the State Public Officials Act by the following act:

(2) The Assembly and Demonstration Act provides that the Assembly and Demonstration Act’s Assembly and Demonstration Act’s Article 10(1) provides that “The Assembly and Demonstration Act’s Article 10(1) provides that “The Assembly and Demonstration Act

On June 13, 2016, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation of the instant disposition, but was dismissed on August 18, 2016.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, Eul evidence 1 through 13 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1 “collective act for purposes other than public service” prohibited by the State Public Officials Act refers to a collective act that may affect the duty of care for the purpose of going against the public interest.

The assembly and demonstration of this case pointed out the problem of nationalization of Korean private textbooks.