beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment for one year, and each of the defendants B shall be punished by imprisonment for eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On February 18, 2013, the Incheon District Court sentenced one year and two years of suspension of execution to the crime of violating the Punishment of Tax Evaders Act at the Incheon District Court. On August 31, 2013, the above judgment became final and conclusive.
[2013 Highest 4641]
1. On September 2010, the Defendants’ co-principal-offenders subscribed to the “F” and “F”, registered the victim G as the representative director, and actually, the Defendants were willing to acquire money by means of receiving loans in the name of the victim, a representative of the corporation, while operating and managing the said corporation.
On October 26, 2011, Defendants: “The employees of the KF and the company operation vehicle should be purchased, and the vehicle purchase price is responsible for us; if the problem arises, the vehicle will be transferred in the name of us.”
However, in fact, the Defendants planned to purchase a vehicle in the name of the victim to provide the vehicle as security and to receive the loan, and there was no intention or ability to pay the purchase price even if the vehicle was purchased by an installment contract.
Accordingly, the Defendants, in collusion with E, deceiving the victim as such, and caused the victim to purchase the 15 million won high-speed vehicle from the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City Inter-dong 616-85, and caused the (ju) Solomon Savings Bank to borrow the 15 million won high-speed vehicle from the 6 million won high-speed vehicle from the Nam-gu 616-85, Nam-gu, Incheon. On the following day, the Defendants received the above vehicle from H as security and acquired the financial profit equivalent to 6 million won.
B. On December 201, 201, the Defendants stated that “the representative of the corporation shall not live in the Gosiwon and shall not have any house, and the interest on the loan and loan shall be paid in full by us.”
However, the defendants purchased a house from the beginning in the name of the victim and received a loan as security and use part of the house.