본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.01.13 2013가합100709

1. The Defendant: (a) on September 27, 2012, the Plaintiff KRW 30,930,073, Plaintiff B, D, and C respectively; and (b) on each of the said KRW 1,00,000 and each of the said KRW.


Basic Facts

The relevant defendant between the parties is the owner of the instant store, who operates a store that sells and repairs imported sludge (hereinafter referred to as the “instant store”) with the trade name of “G” from Daejeon Jung-gu.


A is a person who purchased and operated an off-to-land in the instant store, and the Plaintiff B is the husband of the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff D and C are the children of Plaintiff A and B.

On September 27, 2012, Plaintiff A visited the instant store in order to exchange Otoba in order to exchange Obaday. On September 27, 2012, Plaintiff A visited the instant store, and around 14:39, Plaintiff A fells below the stairs connected to the underground floor located on the right side of the entrance, which was entered by the Plaintiff as the office of the instant store (hereinafter “instant accident”).

The degree of injury and disability of Plaintiff A caused by the instant accident, Plaintiff A suffered serious cerebral cerebral damage, such as an external hiverosis, due to the instant accident.


A is difficult to act on its own due to the current spathy, and it is difficult to discern things and make decisions or express opinions because of the decline in the recognition function.

[Based on recognition, Gap's evidence Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, the result of the examination by this court, as a result of the physical entrustment to the director of the Daejeon University Daejeon Hospital, the plaintiff's overall purport of the argument is that there is a 1-2 cm height at the entrance of the office of this case claimed by the plaintiff, and that there is an acute slope stairs next thereto. Thus, the owner and the possessor of the store of this case are obliged to attach a warning to urge visitors or customers to pay attention to the vicinity of the stairs in order to prevent the fall below the stairs, and to correct the iron door installed in front of the stairs at all times.

Nevertheless, there was no warning to the vicinity of the stairs at the time of the accident, as well as there was a question about the steel system.

As above, the defendant.