The appeal is dismissed.
The grounds of appeal are examined.
For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the charged facts of this case on the ground that there is no proof of crime.
The judgment below
Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, although the lower court’s reasoning was partially inappropriate, the lower court’s above determination is justifiable in its conclusion.
In so doing, contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to the intention of obstructing general traffic or joint principal offenders.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.