logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2015.07.22 2015고정16
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person driving a BM3 car volume.

1. Around September 20:35, 2014, the Defendant driven the pertinent car at a section of about 10km from the distance from the front side of the front side of the front side of the front side of the Dong Culture-dong to the front side of the same city culture-dong, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.110%.

2. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the above SM3 car quantity without being covered by the automobile mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and report on the situation of drinking drivers;

1. Inquiry into mandatory insurance, and making inquiries into the enemy;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to traffic accident-related statements prepared C;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 (the main sentence) of the former Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act (amended by Act No. 12987, Jan. 6, 2015); the selection of each fine;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order has the history of being punished as the reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the same Act and the refusal of the measurement of alcohol again, the defendant's blood alcohol concentration is relatively high, and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime of this case, and circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as ordered by the sentence.

arrow