A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2017, at around 19:40 on December 17, 2017, the Defendant sent to the scene after receiving a report from 112 that “Adoc sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat sat s

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D, E, and F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] : “In the case where the degree of interference with the execution of official duties is minor (one month to eight months) in the area of special mitigation (i.e., assault, intimidation, deceptive scheme, or obstruction of official duties, (i.e., in the case of a special mitigation) / [Pronouncement of sentence] the nature of the defendant is not good, and there are many criminal records; however, there are many criminal records; however, there are many criminal records; the fact that the police officer was seriously killed and submitted a written agreement; and the fact that the police officer submitted the records of this case and the various sentencing factors indicated in the whole theory of the records of this case are considered as the order.