A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On October 6, 2017, at around 03:24, the Defendant 1: (a) taken a scambling at a scambling box located in Busan, and was reported to obstruct traffic by walking on the roads above the second line of the scambling box; (b) taken a scambling on the floor of the scambling box; (c) taken a scambling at the scambling box; and (d) taken a scam for police officers, such as “scambling at the scambling box, scambling at the scambling box,” and “scambling at the right side of the said G to the scambscambling G with drinking, and scambling the scam of the said G to the scambox belonging to the Defendant, and completed the scambling box on the ground that the mother committed the scam.

Damar, a police officer;

Along with the bit of bitbit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a set.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties regarding police officers' protective measures.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to H, G, and E;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes for investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the relevant Act concerning facts constituting an offense (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The crime of this case for the reason of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the protection and observation, and the order to attend a lecture is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, such as the following: (a) the crime of this case is not deemed to have been committed by assaulting police officers on the ground that the defendant got his mother to the D police box; (b) the establishment of the state’s legal order and order and eradicates the light of public authority, there is a need to strictly punish the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties; and (c

However, the circumstances that are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant reflects his mistake, that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same kind of crime, etc.