1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs falling under the following subparagraphs shall be revoked:

1. The following facts may be found as a whole in the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 3, Eul evidence Nos. 2, 4, and 5, with the whole purport of the pleadings.

The Defendant, as a school foundation established under the Private School Act, was operating a G University, and the Plaintiffs were students attending the G University on or around April 2006, and Plaintiff C graduated from the G University on or around August 2008, Plaintiff C, and D around February 2009.

B. In relation to the issue of whether to grant the right to vote for the election of the total number of students of G University to students in 2 and 3 years as an affiliated public health university incorporated into the G University Health and Science University from April 4, 2006 to April 6, 2006, there was an objection between the students belonging to the National Election Commission of the total number of students of G University and the head of an election campaign headquarters, who had run for the election of the Election Commission of the total number of students of the G University, and the Defendant.

C. On April 5, 2006, the Plaintiffs’ act of confinement (1) the faculty members of the G University, including the Election Commission of the total number of students of the G University and the Plaintiffs, visited the principal of the G University to deliver to the Minister of Students present at the school affairs committee held on the third floor of the G University a document containing the contents of the Plaintiffs’ request for recognition of voting rights for the students of the second and third years of the health university.

(2) The student, including the plaintiffs, demanded the Minister to receive and communicate the above documents, but the Minister refused the student's request. After that, the student, including the plaintiffs, was practically forced by a method that prevents the Minister from moving or having access to the space between stairs 2 and 3 of this Sub-Section for about 15 hours following the following day on the ground that the professor, including the Minister, refuses to receive the above documents, and the professor, demanded the Minister to refuse to do so.

(hereinafter “instant confinement”) D.

Each withdrawal disposition against the plaintiffs, and