logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2020.05.07 2019고단3790
출입국관리법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, each of the defendants B and C shall be punished by imprisonment for ten months.

except that from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendants C and Defendant A are de facto marital relations with each other, and Defendants C and Defendant B are self-help agents.

The Defendants conspired to engage in the act of arranging sexual traffic while operating the "Embage area" on the Do and the 6th floor in Goyang-gu, Mangsan-si, and the defendant C and the defendant B served as a role of guiding customers by viewing the carbr, and the defendant A served as a business operator, a lease contract, a management account for commercial sex acts, and a management of the facilities of the above business.

On August 28, 2019, the Defendants received KRW 110,00 from a police officer who pretended to be a customer, and directed the said police officer on his/her inside room, and let F, a woman of sexual traffic with the nationality of Thailand, engage in sexual intercourse with the above police officer to arrange sexual intercourse with the above police officer, as well as arranging sexual intercourse. From June 1, 2019 to November 26, 2019, the Defendants received KRW 110,00 from an unspecified number of customers who visit the above business establishment from around June 1, 2019 to around November 26, 2019, and had them sexual intercourse with the above customers in the inside room, thereby engaging in the business of arranging sexual intercourse.

2. The defendant A shall not employ any foreigner who has no status of sojourn eligible for employment activities in the Republic of Korea;

Nevertheless, the Defendant, from August 27, 2019 to August 28, 2019, employed the F of Thailand’s nationality, which did not have the status of sojourn eligible for visa exemption (B1) as visa exemption (B1), as a female sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Written accusation of the Immigration Office of the two weeks;

1. Report on detection (Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts, Etc.), field photographs, and monthly rent contract for commercial buildings;

1. Investigation report (Submission of Details of A Trade), suspect A's account details, and investigation report (examination of amounts additionally collected);

1. Individual;

arrow