logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.25 2014고정1568
모욕
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, the Defendants did not pay the fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인들은 2013. 6. 1. 09:00경 인천 계양구 D오피스텔 관리사무소에서, E, F이 있는 자리에서 피해자 G에게 피고인 A은 “이 새끼야, 낯짝배기 이 새끼야, 장로 이 새끼야, 교회에서 하나님한테 기도해봐 이 새끼야, 하나님이 있으면 이 새끼야, 너 같은 놈 이 새끼야, 벌써 벼락 맞아 죽었어 이새끼야"라고 큰소리로 말하고, 피고인 B은 ”쌍놈의 새끼, 어디서 기어 나와 가지고 주제파악 못하고 앉아가지고 이 쌍놈의 새끼, 그냥 어 말이라면 다야 개새끼야“라고 큰소리로 말하여 공연히 피해자를 모욕하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each of the Defendants’ respective legal statements (as of the third trial date)

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning the applicable criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the Defendants and their defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, respectively, of the provisional payment order

1. The summary of the Defendants and the defense counsel asserted that the Defendants committed the crime of insult because they did not constitute the crime of insult because of lack of performance, although they stated the victim’s motive, etc. as stated in the judgment at the time.

2. Determination

A. The public performance in the crime of insult refers to the state in which many, unspecified or unspecified persons can recognize it, and if there is a possibility that certain facts about a certain person might be disseminated to an unspecified or unspecified person, it shall be deemed that the requirements of the public performance are satisfied, or if there is no possibility to spread differently, it shall be deemed that the public performance is lacking.

(See Supreme Court Decision 83Do49 delivered on April 10, 1984). B.

In light of the above legal principles, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this Court, the Defendants are the defendants.

arrow