A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

On April 1, 2014, at around 01:35, the Defendant took a bath to E, the other party to the assault case, who was under investigation at the D District Office of Seodaemun-gu Seoul Police Station D District, Seoul, and was under investigation as a suspect of the assault case at the D District Office of Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, the Defendant took a bath to “I am well-feasible and well-fasible. I am well-being. I am well-fasible and well-fasible.” The Defendant took a bath to “I am tax, I am well-fasy. I am well-fasy, I am his head, and obstructed the legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression of crime and investigation of F, a police official.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Du1164, Apr. 1

1. The reasons for sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of probation and community service order [the scope of recommendation] are determined as above on the ground that there is no basic area (6-1 year and April) (6-1 year and April) of the basic area (the special person) of obstruction of performance of official duties.