logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2014. 08. 20. 선고 2014누40410 판결
주거지역 편입 후 3년이 경과되어 양도한 쟁점토지에 대한 8년 자경감면 배제[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court 2013Gudan1762

Case Number of the previous trial

The High Court Decision 2012Du4511 / [Judgment]

Title

Reduction or exemption of 8 years for the key land transferred after 3 years have elapsed since the incorporation into a residential area;

Summary

The key land is a public notice of approval of the housing site development plan on August 5, 08 after three years have elapsed since it was incorporated into a residential area; and it is deemed that it constitutes farmland excluded from self-regulation under Article 66(4)1 of the Enforcement Decree of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act due to transfer on January 20, 09, and thus, it is difficult to accept

Related statutes

Article 69 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act (Reduction or Exemption of Transfer Income Tax for Self-Cultivating Farmland)

Cases

2014Nu4010 Revocation of Disposition of Revoking Transfer Income Tax Correction

Plaintiff and appellant

○ ○

Defendant, Appellant

○ Head of tax office

Judgment of the first instance court

Suwon District Court Decision 2013Gudan1762 Decided December 4, 2013

Conclusion of Pleadings

2014.07.16

Imposition of Judgment

2014.08.20

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's application for rectification of capital gains tax against the plaintiff on February 23, 2012 shall be revoked.

The rejection disposition shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;

The reasoning of this court's ruling is that "Class 1 general residential area" in the fourth second second part of the judgment of the court of first instance.

In accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, the Ministry of Construction and Transportation shall cite the fourth eighth-eight-eightth exclusive residential area as "the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs" as the grounds for the judgment of the first instance.

2. Conclusion

The judgment of the first instance is justifiable. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow