logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.17 2016고단5594
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On November 3, 2016, around 20:20 on November 3, 2016, the Defendant: (a) received a report from 112 that a guest who provided alcohol in a restaurant of “E” located in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D became aware of the customer’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

During the process of confirming the facts to I, “Nein” to the above G and H

Does the police;

This Hah Hahh, while taking the bath theory, he saw the chest of the above G by hand, pushed the chest of the said G by hand, pushed the chest of the above H by hand, and laid the finger of the above H by hand.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted with police officers G and H, thereby obstructing police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the protection of people's lives, bodies, and property.

나. 피고인은 같은 날 20:30 경 위 ‘E’ 식당 부근 도로에서 위와 같이 경찰관들을 폭행한 후 현행범인 체포되어 순찰차량 뒷좌석에 탑승한 채 이동하던 중 옆에 탑승하고 있던 서울 강서 경찰서 J 지구대 소속 경사 K에게 “ 씹새끼야, 개새끼야.” 등 계속하여 욕설을 하다가 갑자기 주먹으로 위 K의 오른쪽 눈 부위를 1회 때려 안경이 파손되어 바닥에 떨어지게 하고, 발로 위 K의 등 부위를 1회 걷어찼다.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted K police officers to interfere with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers with the arrest of flagrant offenders.

2. The Defendant: (a) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of Article 1, the Defendant: (b) took a bath to a police officer in a restaurant; and (c) assaulting a police officer, etc.; and (d) made customers, who were fluent, fluent, went out of the restaurant.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim L's restaurant business that operates the above restaurant by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to G, L, H, or K;

1. A victim K-face photo, smartphone image CD.

arrow