The judgment below

Among them, it is against each crime listed in No. 1 of the crime sight table 5 through 31 of the decision of the court below with respect to Defendant A.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. In light of the various sentencing conditions of Defendant A and B, the lower court’s sentence against the said Defendants [the Defendant A: 4 months of imprisonment (each of the crimes listed in No. 1 No. 1 to No. 4 at the time of sale) and one year and two months of imprisonment (each of the crimes listed in No. 1 No. 5 to No. 31 at the time of sale), and Defendant B] is too unreasonable.

B. In light of the various sentencing conditions of the prosecutor’s instant case, the lower court’s sentence against Defendant D (one year of imprisonment, two years of suspended sentence, one hundred and sixty hours of community service, and confiscation) is deemed unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. (i) Judgment on Defendant A’s appeal (i.e., the part on the crime No. 11 through No. 4 of the Judgment of the court below as to the crime committed by Defendant A as stated in the Judgment of the court below, and the above Defendant recognized the crime of acquiring stolen property of this case and against his mistake. In the case of each of the above crimes, it is necessary to consider the crime for which a judgment as stated in all the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below has become final and the crime for which a judgment is to be rendered simultaneously and the principle of equity is to

However, the crime of acquiring stolen property in this case is not harmful to the quality of the crime in that the above defendant acquired stolen vehicles that were stolen by the defendant B, etc. for the purpose of obtaining economic benefits through the unauthorized Scrapping, and committed the crime systematically and systematically repeatedly for a long time, as stated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below. ② The defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence for the same crime as indicated in the facts constituting the crime in the judgment of the court below. ③ The defendant A continues to commit the crime in this case without being aware of the facts constituting the crime, ③ the defendant A confirmed the seizure of the vehicle to the defendant B and purchased stolen vehicles, which are stolen, so that the defendant B continued to commit the larceny, and the joint defendants C of the court below ordered the transportation of stolen vehicles to participate in the series of crimes in the crime in this case as to the illegal scrapping. ④