A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 2017, the Defendant discovered that the victim E (V, female, and 62 years old) is prone in front of the D iron shop located in the Southern Hamk-gun C, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, such as where the victim was prone by both descendants in the future.

2. On May 9, 2018, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim, such as: (a) in the vicinity of the victim F (F, 79 years old); (b) discovered that the victim is mixed; and (c) finding the victim’s chests in the future of the victim’s own damage; and (d) holding the victim’s chests only once by both descendants.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on respective statements made by the E and F;

1. Relevant Article 298 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes - The defendant is a person subject to registration of personal information under Article 42(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes, and is obligated to submit personal information to a related agency pursuant to Article 43 of the same Act in cases where a conviction against the defendant becomes final and conclusive as to the criminal facts stated in the judgment that he/she should obtain personal information on the grounds that the defendant acknowledges his/her mistake, agreed with the victim E, suffers from dementia, etc.

There are special circumstances in which it is impossible to impose an order to attend a course pursuant to the proviso to Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes because the defendant exempted from an order to attend a course suffers from dementia and it is difficult to take a normal educational effect due to the

Since it is judged, the order to attend the course is not concurrently imposed on the defendant.

The defendant's age, exemption from the disclosure or notification order of personal information;