logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2017.07.20 2017가단20233
소유권확인
Text

1. Of the Defendant’s and the obligor’s list attached Form 2, each entry in the debtor’s column shall be recorded in the attached Table 1’s list.

Reasons

1. As long as the owner is specified as “B” or “C” in the land cadastre or forest land cadastre for each real estate listed in the attached Table 1’s real estate list (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”), the Defendant asserts that there is no benefit in confirmation, given that there is no benefit in confirmation.

According to the reasoning of the judgment below, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 (including a branch number), and the fact-finding results and the purport of the whole pleadings with respect to the resident registration center of this court, the plaintiff filed a lawsuit against each debtor recorded in the debtor column in the attached Table No. 2, E, the heir of the Daejeon District Court, in the attached Table No. 2, on the ground of the cancellation of title trust with respect to each of the real estate of this case which is unregistered real estate. The above court ruled that "the heir of this case will implement the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer due to the cancellation of title trust with respect to each of the real estate of this case." The plaintiff tried to take the procedure for the registration of ownership transfer pursuant to the above judgment after the above judgment became final and conclusive, but the plaintiff failed to accept it on the ground that "B in the Seoul District Court F, the owner of each of the real estate of this case, and Eul, the heir of this case, as the heir of this case, could not be recognized as the same person."

Even if the registered titleholder is not known, it is reasonable to determine that the registered titleholder is not known.

Therefore, this is applicable.

arrow