A Imprisonment of four years, three years of imprisonment for Defendant B, and one year and six months of imprisonment for Defendant C and J, Defendant D, E, F, and each other.

[2013 Highest 252]

1. Defendant A and B, together with three telephone inducement policies with which the name of the Defendants is unknown, misrepresented the employees of the NA by telephone to use customer information obtained through the Internet, and misrepresented them to deposit money for a certain period of time, and deceiving them to transfer money to a designated account by means of credit management to a low interest rate, and deceiving them to transfer money to a designated account if they transfer money to a designated account by an unspecified person. The telephone inducement policies with which the name is unknown, which entices the unspecified person to transfer money to a designated account. The Defendant A purchased customer information necessary for committing a crime through the Internet, cellular phone, and electronic financial transaction cards of financial institutions, and the Defendant B shared the role of withdrawing the money transferred from the cash withdrawal.

On October 16, 2012, the telephone inducement book with which the name is unknown is falsely called as follows: (a) in the office of the office of the 3rd floor of the X apartment commercial in Busan, Busan, the Busan, and (b) in misrepresentation of the victim Y by phone calls to the victim Y, and (c) in order to enable the victim to transfer KRW 3,000,000 to the bank account in the name of the company in the name of the company in the name of the Nonetnet, Inc. on the same day, and (b) in order to transfer KRW 3,00,000 to the bank account in the name of the company in the name of the company in the name of the company in the name of the company in which the above telephone inducement book was delivered, and (c) in the cash withdrawal machine established near the office after the receipt of the deposit of the damaged amount

As a result, the Defendants conspired with telephone inducement policies in which their names cannot be known, and acquired 3,00,000 won from the victim.

Defendants.