If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The Defendant owned a colorer equivalent to KRW 200,000 at the market price in the D factory operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun.

On December 13, 2012, enforcement officers E affiliated with the Daejeon District Court attached a seizure indication to the defendant's factory under the above court No. 2012No. 5599, with the delegation of enforcement by creditors F. creditor F.

However, from December 13, 2012 to the 15th day of the same month, the Defendant brought without permission a seizure mark attached to the above-mentioned color server at the defendant's factory in the above-mentioned situation, thereby impairing its utility.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Results of this Court’s verification of artificial intelligence;

1. Some statements concerning the suspect examination protocol of the defendant;

1. Partial statement of the police statement against the defendant;

1. Application of the F’s authentic document (including photographs attached thereto) Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense and Article 140 (1) of the Criminal Act selecting a penalty;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.