2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

A. The Defendant’s damages liability arises. (1) On February 2012, 2012, the grounds that the expressive act person expressed critical opinions against another person cannot be deemed unlawful. However, if the form and content of the expressive act falls under personal attack that is insulting and dissatisfic, or if the personality right is infringed by publishing distorted facts going beyond a certain degree of exaggeration on another person’s personal affairs, it may constitute a separate type of tort from defamation.

(Supreme Court Decision 2005Da65494 Decided April 9, 2009) b) The instant case is returned to the Dominant, CFC (hereinafter “CF”) and returned to the instant case.

The facts that the Defendant, who was the auditor, made a statement, such as ① on February 1, 2012, ② on the 13th of the same month, and ③ on the 16th of the same month, that was the chairperson of the above association, held on the 16th of the same month, may be recognized by comprehensively considering the purport of the Plaintiff’s statement and the entire pleadings, and further, considering the circumstances leading up to the holding of the board of directors, ② the contents of the above recognition, ② the Plaintiff’s social dialogue and evaluation of the Plaintiff’s losses at the time of the meeting, as well as the circumstances leading up to the holding of the board of directors, the Plaintiff’s social dialogue and evaluation of the Plaintiff’s losses, etc., as well as the circumstances leading up to the holding of the board of directors, the Plaintiff’s social dialogue and evaluation of the Plaintiff’s losses at the time of the meeting.